June 29, 2006

Slippery Slopes

I made a point of telling all my friends back in the day that when they passed smoking bans at bars, more restrictive laws would follow not far behind. And you can see the machine in action. I can see both sides, but as a former smoker, I don't like seeing people who smoke having their freedoms restricted.

The big push lately is the whole second-hand smoke thing. I can understand wanting to ban smoking in places where there's poor ventilation or where smoke can reasonably be expected to accumulate. But out in the open air? Let's bring some perspective to all of this.

The bus traffic along Madison Avenue here in Manhattan makes for some poor air quality. As a matter of fact, the worst air quality in the city, as determined by those air quality instruments hiding under those mysterious green boxes on the sidewalk, is right on Madison Avenue and 42nd Street. I'd venture to say that many New Yorkers risk premature death by merely breathing. (And the American Lung Association would say the same thing.)

Yet you don't see activists proposing that we ban bus traffic, do you? Everything's a trade-off, a compromise. And I don't think that anything is wrong with smokers drawing a line in the sand and saying that they'll be pushed no further, considering what they've had to give up in recent years.

If the slope is that slippery, however, and we find smoking limited to private property or some other such crapola, I'm going to use the same slippery slope logic and arguments to go after McDonald's and other fast food restaurants for the damage they do to the state of public health. As long as we're taking away people's choices, why shouldn't we make crappy food our next target?

Posted by THespos at June 29, 2006 10:38 AM | TrackBack
Comments
All comments are property of the individual poster who left them. Everything else, copyright 2005, Tom Hespos

I never smoked in my life, so.....I am completely "for" any and all bans re/ such a horrible habit. Maybe one day they will get the "drift". I have seen good friends inflicted by this "disease" have their life completely changed forever. (their "quality of life" reduced drastically) They made a choice
"many moons" ago, their mentality being; "I can stop at any time" and "it is not going to happen to me".... They didn't stop and it did happen.
Air quality and the fast food industry comparison is beyond "slippery slope" logic. (Someone smoking where I am present has an effect on me, while someone eating a "Whopper" in my presence is not going to cause those "sneaky carcinogens" to infiltrate my body.) It is now a plain and simple known fact that anything that has to do with cigarette smoking is a plain and simple "death certificate" for all.
Dad

Posted by: Dad at June 30, 2006 10:16 AM

What about the guy who decides to eat fast food three times a week? He might not be polluting the air around him, but he's certainly costing us money in the form of increased insurance rates and higher taxes when he has a debilitating coronary at 46. So if we're going to take away choices because what one group does marginally affects what happens to another, where's the line? I say if we're going to slide down that slope, let's slide all the way and place some bans on food that kills us.

Posted by: Tom Hespos at July 5, 2006 04:15 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?